Is the deliberate mass murder of civilians on a huge scale ever justified this article does not have an answer for this question however, it is important to note that this was a very specific goal of england and america in world war ii as the quotes above show. Terrorism means the deliberate targeting of innocent civilians, and targeted they were, with the cutely named “little boy” atomic bomb dropped on hiroshima at a location and time of day when.
Targeting civilians made a parliamentary speech declaring that it was “against international law to bomb civilians as such and to make deliberate attacks on the civilian population but the onset of world war ii began the transition away from these earlier beliefs. On august 6, 1945, at 815 in the morning, a nuclear fission bomb was exploded in the air over the civilian population of hiroshima in an already virtually defeated japan the force of the explosion was equivalent to fifteen thousand tons of tnt.
Before world war ii, most nations condemned targeting civilians in bombing raids as the war went on, the nations at war expanded their bombing targets from military to industrial ones, then to workers' houses, and finally to entire cities and their civilian populations. It is noteworthy that one of the key points of argument surrounding the issue of strategic bombing, particularly in the debate on the american use of nuclear weapons, is whether the use of indiscriminate force against civilian populations was effective and justified in bringing the war to a quicker end.
But the targeting of civilians in world war ii has left a legacy extending far beyond hiroshima and nagasaki in the half-century following the end of the war, the united states and its allies (and many of its non-allies) have intentionally bombed civilians in vietnam, cambodia, lebanon, palestine, iraq, afghanistan, and a host of other countries.
By may, 1941, 43,000 british civilians were killed and more than a million houses destroyed although they were not the first to start it, by the end of the war the united states and great britain were bombing of civilians on a far greater scale than japan and germany had ever done. During world war ii, unlike any other normal wars, all countries in both sides mobilized the civilian population to work in factories and other workshops that made weapons of wars, thus making them combatants according to the 1907 hague convention. In 1945, the us extended their policy of targeting innocent civilians to the cities of japan, resulting in even greater destruction than any of the european campaigns in fact, one night’s worth of fire raiding on tokyo claimed the lives of more than 80,000 civilians, more than the casualties incurred from the atomic bomb detonation in nagasaki.
Can the direct targeting of civilians ever be morally justified 10 pages can the direct targeting of civilians ever be morally justified, if so in what circumstances enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population before or during the war”1 the direct targeting of civilians is in breach. The use of the atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki in august 1945 is in a sense the logical and moral culmination of allied area and incendiary bombing strategies developed over the course of world war ii civilian populations had long been the targets of aerial bombings, a fact that probably made the use of the atomic bombs on urban areas seem less radical.